What Do You Mean, Pluto Isn’t A Planet?

What Do You Mean, Pluto Isn’t A Planet?

For the last couple of days, we have been scientists questioning, observing, and analyzing. It’s been a lot of fun and the students have had a great time doing some fun experiments including testing the flight of paper airplanes. Yesterday, we continued as scientists as we studied a mysterious substance found in my backyard, called Oobleck. This mysterious green substance has some very unique properties which we took some time exploring as you no doubt discovered when they came home covered in dust! It does wash out, I promise. We started by talking about what properties are and how we can observe the properties of objects. Then I showed them the Oobleck! Kids had a great time mucking around. In doing this, the students discovered that Oobleck was not quite what it initially appeared to be! After a few minutes, students took some time to write down 5 unique properties of this Oobleck.

Yesterday, we set up a scientific convention. Scientists all over the world get together in conventions to discuss and debate important scientific discoveries and questions to come to a consensus on various issues. Scientists use these conventions to come to an agreed upon truth about various scientific issues and thus are very important in the advance of science. The example I gave to the students was the scientific convention where scientists came to an agreement that Pluto was to be demoted to the category of dwarf planet and was not to be in the same category as our other planets. There was a huge debate and lots of arguing but at the end of the day, scientists had come together and agreed to change Science.

So we had our own little convention today to come up with some truths about this mysterious substance. It was a great time arguing and voting. The kids came up with some great points. Here are some pictures from the convention:

We’re going to be doing some neat things in the next couple of days in Science so keep an eye out here for more news! In the meantime, here is a nice video by one of my favorite scientists, Bill Nye, talking about why Pluto isn’t a planet.

Also, I found this great article with pictures showing what we would see in our night sky if the other planets in the Solar System were as close as our Moon is to Earth. The first one is Mars:

Our moon is a pretty big object. It’s big enough to be a respectable planet in its own right, if it were orbiting the sun instead of the Earth. (Actually, it is orbiting the sun in a nearly perfectly circular orbit, that the Earth only slightly perturbs… but that’s a topic for another day.) The Moon is a quarter the diameter of the Earth. Only Pluto has a satellite that is larger, in proportion to the size of the planet it orbits.

But what if the Moon were size of Mars, instead? It would like the picture above. Check out how some of the other planets of the Solar System would look in our sky, if they took the Moon’s place.

What if we had a planet instead of a Moon?

At a distance of about 240,000 miles, the Moon occupies a space in the night sky about half a degree wide. By sheer coincidence, this is almost exactly the same size the sun appears, which is why we occasionally get total solar eclipses. (We don’t get a total eclipse every time the Moon passes in front of the sun because the Moon is sometimes a little closer to the Earth and sometimes a little further away, so it will cover more or less of the sun during any eclipse.)

But it’s interesting to imagine what the night sky might look like if one of the Solar System’s planets were to replace our moon. (We’d have to ignore things like tides and gravitation, but that’s the advantage of doing things in the mind’s eye.) So what would we see if we were to replace the moon with Mars? The red planet is almost exactly twice the size of the Moon, so it would appear twice as big in the Earth’s sky. It would be easy to see with the naked eye details on the surface of the planet that were previously visible only through telescopes. You could watch the ice caps grow and shrink during the changing seasons, see dust storms form and move across the planet and make out features like Vallis Marineris and Olympus Mons.

What if we had a planet instead of a Moon?

Venus is three and a half times larger than the Moon. It would be nearly as large in our sky as the Earth appeared to the Apollo astronauts, when they were walking on the surface of the Moon. There wouldn’t be too much to see, other than vague swirling patterns in the dense, ivory-colored cloud cover. (We’re pretending, of course, that Venus would still have the same atmospheric conditions if it were in essentially the same orbit as the Earth.) It would be an amazingly bright object, however — much brighter than our moon. Not only does Venus reflect six times more light than the Moon, it covers an area 40 times larger… so the night skies would seem as bright as daylight.

What if we had a planet instead of a Moon?

Neptune is more than fourteen times larger than the Moon — and now we’re talking about something that would look really impressive. It would loom like an enormous blue balloon in the night sky. And dominate the daytime sky, as well. All other things being equal, an eclipse of the sun would seem to last forever. Once the sun disappeared behind the edge of the “moon” earth would be plunged into darkness for over an hour and half.

What if we had a planet instead of a Moon?

Uranus, which is nearly the same size as Neptune, would provide a very similar view.

What if we had a planet instead of a Moon?

Saturn would be an astonishing sight. Almost 35 times larger than the Moon, this golden globe would cover nearly 18 degrees of the sky. We’d be a little further away from Saturn than its satellite Dione. In fact, we’d be more likely to be a satellite of Saturn ourselves than the other way around. The rings would stretch nearly from horizon to horizon.

What if we had a planet instead of a Moon?

Jupiter would trump them all. Forty times larger than the Moon, Jupiter would stretch 20 degrees across the sky. It would also look a little different from the telescopic and spacecraft photos we’re used to seeing. This close, we’d be looking “up” at the northern hemisphere and “down” at the southern hemisphere, so the cloud bands would be distinctly curved in perspective. In fact, we’d not be able to see the north and south poles of the planet.

To visualize Jupiter taking the place of our Moon, we really have to use our imaginations. Since we’d be about the same distance from Jupiter as its satellite Io, the earth would be subject to the same tidal stresses caused by Jupiter’s immense gravitation. We might have a much more volcanic-looking landscape around us. There might also be little evidence for life since we’d also be in the midst of Jupiter’s deadly radiation field. But as I said at the beginning, we have to make some allowances for imagination!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe By Email

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Skip to toolbar